Voting Results: 2022-12-16 to 2022-12-18

Vote Posts: >>39118257, >>39135607, >>39192154

Ballots:

• /2434/: >>39127223
  • Validation method: Tripcode of either !5/2kkxYfkE or !b4EqAalPrQ. Valid!
• /morig/: >>39171235
  • Validation method: https://rentry.org/morig-vote-ballots. Valid!
• /mep/: >>39128024
  • Validation method: Tripcode of !AvkpUsvqyw. Valid!
• /voms/: >>39129620
  • Validation method: https://rentry.org/guyarayasna. Valid!
• /nasa/: >>39130307
  • Validation method: https://rentry.org/DeathAndBurials. Valid!
• /wg/ >>32478913
  • Validation method: https://rentry.org/wgballot. Valid!
• nijimales >>39135968
  • Validation method: Tripcode of !6tByAJW6/Q. Valid!
• /meat/ >>39175626
  • Validation method: Tripcode of !!J7IsvbPoQE1. Valid!
• /V7/ >>32478913
  • Validation method: Tripcode of !y30Ltc3tbw. Valid!

Tallies

1. Approve land assignment confirmation for /hag/ as per picrel. Y/N/Abstain

   I would like to formally request the land as in the pic for nation of Lanudohagulovinugo (/hag/).
   The reasoning for it being:
   -It had been the initial land given to /hag/
   -I have setup basic lore under the assumption that this was the land i was allowed to work with.
   -The conditions of the land like climate are suitable for my needs.

• Yes, unanimous
  9 Votes Total

2. Approve land assignment confirmation for /tsunX/ (In the place of /tsun/) as per picrel. Y/N/Abstain

   1. Their lore is tied to their land.
   2. That is their original spot and per the province system they can take it.
   3. Their lore was posted when the system was being made which caused their provincing.

• Yes, unanimous
  9 Votes Total

Summary

Both land assignments are confirmed.

Votes Tallied officially at 23:59 EST 2022-12-18.

Ballot Archive

• /2434/: >>39127223
  /2434/ votes:
  

1. yes
2. yes
   good morning and good night.

• /morig/: >>39171235
  /morig/ votes: https://rentry.org/morig-vote-ballots

  Approve land assignment confirmation for /hag/ as per picrel. Y/N/Abstain

  Yes

  Approve land assignment confirmation for /tsunX/ (In the place of /tsun/) as per picrel. Y/N/Abstain

  Yes
• /mep/: >>39128024
  mep votes:
  

1. Yes, welcome to our autism and those reason are valid.
2. Yes, since I thought they were already placed.

• /voms/: >>39129620
  https://rentry.org/Voms-VD
  proof: https://rentry.org/guyarayasna
  I also propose that after someone is verified for a voting doc, that they do not need to repeat this process of editing a lore doc. It's pointless.
  

1. Approve land assignment confirmation for /hag/ as per picrel. Y/N/Abstain
   I would like to formally request the land as in the pic for nation of Lanudohagulovinugo (/hag/).
   The reasoning for it being:
   • It had been the initial land given to /hag/
   • I have setup basic lore under the assumption that this was the land i was allowed to work with.
   • The conditions of the land like climate are suitable for my needs.

---

Yes. /hag/ writer has shown tremendous energy towards their thread and per this:

"If you are legitimately a new rep, or thinking about becoming a new rep, and want your old borders restored then not to worry. We will respect your wishes and restore them on the condition that you actually write for the thread that you represent."

They should be honored. Furthermore, as to not repeat myself. I believe that the whole province doc needs to be put into a new document that clarifies the rules better as personally I see no reason for nations that were provinced claiming their original lands to have to get the approval of the thread via voting.

---

2. Approve land assignment confirmation for /tsunX/.(In the place of /tsun/) as per picrel. Y/N/Abstain
   The reasoning for it being:
   • Their lore is tied to their land.
   • That is their original spot and per the province system they can take it.
   • Their lore was posted when the system was being made which caused their provincing.

---

Yes. /tsunX/ came in around the time that the system was being made, and I thinking before they were even formalized, which in that case it was just a mistake. Same reasoning as above, and I furthermore call on all reps to vote both of them in and consider my proposal

---

• /nasa/: >>39130307
  https://rentry.org/DeathAndBurials
  /nasa/ vote because I'm bored
  

1. Aye
2. Aye

• /wg/ >>32478913
  /wg/ votes yes to both. https://rentry.org/wgballot
• nijimales >>39135968
  I, the nijisanji males representative would like to vote on behalf of our thread.

1. Yes, hagbro love
2. Yes, TsunXanon love (Come back please.)

• /meat/ >>39175626
  

1. Approve land assignment confirmation for /hag/ as per picrel. Y/N/Abstain

   Aye

2. Approve land assignment confirmation for /tsunX/ (In the place of /tsun/) as per picrel. Y/N/Abstain

   Aye

• /V7/ >>32478913
  V7 votes;
  

1. Yea
2. Yea