/voms/ Voting Document
December 16th, 2022 Vote
This vote begins at 2022-12-16 23:59 EST and ends 48 hours later at, at 2022-12-18 23:59 EST.
The questions up for vote are the following.
- Approve land assignment confirmation for /hag/ as per picrel. Y/N/Abstain
I would like to formally request the land as in the pic for nation of Lanudohagulovinugo (/hag/).
The reasoning for it being:- It had been the initial land given to /hag/
- I have setup basic lore under the assumption that this was the land i was allowed to work with.
- The conditions of the land like climate are suitable for my needs.
Yes. /hag/ writer has shown tremendous energy towards their thread and per this:
"If you are legitimately a new rep, or thinking about becoming a new rep, and want your old borders restored then not to worry. We will respect your wishes and restore them on the condition that you actually write for the thread that you represent."
They should be honored. Furthermore, as to not repeat myself. I believe that the whole province doc needs to be put into a new document that clarifies the rules better as personally I see no reason for nations that were provinced claiming their original lands to have to get the approval of the thread via voting.
- Approve land assignment confirmation for /tsunX/.(In the place of /tsun/) as per picrel. Y/N/Abstain
The reasoning for it being:- Their lore is tied to their land.
- That is their original spot and per the province system they can take it.
- Their lore was posted when the system was being made which caused their provincing.
Yes. /tsunX/ came in around the time that the system was being made, and I thinking before they were even formalized, which in that case it was just a mistake. Same reasoning as above, and I furthermore call on all reps to vote both of them in and consider my proposal
January 13th Vote
This vote begins at 2023-1-13 18:00 EST and ends 48 hours later at, at 2023-1-15 18:00 EST.
The questions up for vote are the following.
- Should PPT be put at its former borders in the world per their rep? >>40404582 (Y/N/A)
Yes per this:
"If you are legitimately a new rep, or thinking about becoming a new rep, and want your old borders restored then not to worry. We will respect your wishes and restore them on the condition that you actually write for the thread that you represent."
They should be honored. Furthermore, as to not repeat myself. I believe that the whole province doc needs to be put into a new document that clarifies the rules better as personally I see no reason for nations that were provinced claiming their original lands to have to get the approval of the thread via voting.
- Should Rumina be put at their desired location per Figure 1. (Y/N/A)
Yes, I think they should because it is a nice spot for them and they have nice lore planned.
- Should the borders of the Indie Continent be updated per Figure 2 (Y/N/A)
Yes. (Reasoning here: >>40709774)
- If a nation was turned into provinces and wants to use their old borders, they can have them without needing to hold a vote, assuming the land hasn't been taken by any other threads? (Y/N/A)
- By Law would read "There is no vote for a nation wishing to use their old borders if they were turned into provinces, assuming the land is available."
Yes.
- Change the wording of By-Law 4.2 from (Y/N/A):
- Previous Wording: "Link to a post containing a rentry link pertaining to lore or story of the thread one is voting for, with the rentry edited to verify the poster to be authentic."
- New Wording: "Voting Rentry that needs to be verified with story or lore doc the first time it is used to verify the poster to be authentic."
- Voting Rentries will be placed in the Trip Verification Rentry once Verified.
yes. We have been doing this like this regardless, and I think this is a more streamlined method.