Voting Results: 07/29/22-07/31/22

Disclaimer

Due to increased discussion and new information being brought up during the vote, these results should not be considered official in any way until further notice.

Vote posts: >>29542773, >>29547294, >>29563020, >>29604560, >>29635949, >>29686311, >>29717699

Ballots:

/risu/ >>29543882
/2434/ >>29547411
/inf/ >>29547836
/who/ >>29547882
/lazulight/ >>29547925
/vrt/ >>29548512 >>29627286
/pcg/ >>29548826
/wg/ >>29549885 >>29692170
/nijien/ >>29557446 >>29709261
/morig/ >>29573672
/kr/ >>29627349
/warkop/ >>29627505
/mans/ >>29627647
/nasfaqg/ >>29628156

Tally:

Where should /mans/ be placed? Choose your most preferred option from pic related.

/risu/: 4
/2434/: 4
/inf/: A
/who/: /mans/'s choice, or 4 otherwise (counted as 1)
/lazulight/: 4, 3 as a backup (counted as 4)
/vrt/: 1
/pcg/: 4
/wg/: 1
/nijien/: 4
/morig/: /mans/'s choice (counted as 1)
/kr/: 4
/warkop/: 4 if motions 2 and 3 pass, 1 otherwise (counted as 4)
/mans/: 1
/nasfaqg/: 1

6 for I, 7 for IV, 1 for abstain: no majority decision

Should /stars/ and bakatare be swapped to be nearer related threads?

/risu/: Y
/2434/: Y
/inf/: Y
/who/: Y
/lazulight/: Y
/vrt/: Y
/pcg/: Y
/wg/: N
/nijien/: Y
/morig/: Y
/kr/: Y
/warkop/: Y
/mans/: Y
/nasfaqg/: N

12 for yes, 2 for no: motion passes

Should the current bakatare territory have land removed to place /v7/ and /mhm/ as in pic related?

/risu/: Y
/2434/: Y
/inf/: A
/who/: Y
/lazulight/: Y
/vrt/: Y
/pcg/: Y
/wg/: N
/nijien/: Y
/morig/: Y
/kr/: Y
/warkop/: Y
/mans/: Y
/nasfaqg/: N

11 for yes, 2 for no, 1 for abstain: motion passes

Should /nasa/'s territory be given to /cope/ once they return to the stars?

/risu/: A
/2434/: A
/inf/: Y
/who/: N
/lazulight/: A
/vrt/: N
/pcg/: A
/wg/: N
/nijien/: A
/morig/: N
/kr/: A
/warkop/: A
/mans/: A, or /cope/'s choice (counted as A)
/nasfaqg/: N

1 for yes, 5 for no, 8 for abstain: majority abstained

To initiate a revote over an issue, currently one must have the support of at least three anons. Should this be changed to require the support of at least three reps/mediators? You may not abstain for this question.

/risu/: N
/2434/: N
/inf/: Y
/who/: N
/lazulight/: N
/vrt/: Y, or 6 anons (counted as Y)
/pcg/: Y, or 6 anons (counted as Y)
/wg/: N
/nijien/: Y
/morig/: N
/kr/: Y
/warkop/: N
/mans/: N
/nasfaqg/: N

5 for yes, 9 for no: motion fails

Summary:

No location received more than 50% of the votes in proposal 1, so it will be put to a revote. Proposals 2 and 3 pass due to receiving more than 50% of the votes. Since the majority abstained for proposal 4, it will be shelved until the situation is clarified. Proposal 5 fails due to at least half the representatives voting against it. Thus, bylaw 4 stays as currently written.