Voting Results: 07/22/22-07/24/22

Notice:

As of 08/17/22, sakuran's votes have been removed due to reasonable suspicions of having been cast by a falseflagger. This does not change any of the outcomes below.

Vote posts: >>28885657, >>28896506, >>28951833, >>28989588, >>29014228, >>29068135

Ballots:

/lazulight/ >>28886086 >>28976085
/nasa/ >>28886125
/2434/ >>28886400
/pcg/ >>28886988
/vrt/ >>28887469
/nijien/ >>28887473
/haha/ >>28888126
/inf/ >>28897320 >>28900373
/who/ >>28898388
/morig/ >>28900067
/warkop/ >>28900539
/wg/ >>28913228
~~/sakuran/ >>28983350~~
/nasfaqg/ >>29057201
/meat/ >>29064039

Tallies:

Should the borders of the repped nations in nijicontinent be adjusted to match picrel? See >>28821475 for a comparison with the current borders. (Note that this vote does not include changes to /ahoy/ or the creation of the /nenmen/ (/luxnoc/) nation) You may propose any alternate border suggestions as well.

/lazulight/: Y
/nasa/: Y
/2434/: Y
/pcg/: Y
/vrt/: Y
/nijien/: Y
/haha/: Y
/inf/: Yes if nijireps agree (counted as Y)
/who/: A
/morig/: Yes if nijireps agree (counted as Y)
/warkop/: Y
/wg/: Y
~~/sakuran/: Yes if nijireps agree (counted as Y)~~
/nasfaqg/: Yes if nijireps agree (counted as Y)
/meat/: Y

14 13 for yes, 1 for abstain: motion passes

Should the borders of the unrepped nations in nijicontinent (ahoy, warkop, kr, nijimales) be adjusted to match picrel? You may specify which ones you agree with.

/lazulight/: Y
/nasa/: Y
/2434/: Y
/pcg/: Y
/vrt/: Y
/nijien/: Y
/haha/: Y
/inf/: A
/who/: A
/morig/: N
/warkop/: Y
/wg/: Y
~~/sakuran/: No for /ahoy/, yes otherwise~~
/nasfaqg/: N
/meat/: Y

/ahoy/: 10 for yes, 3 2 for no, 2 for abstain
others: 11 10 for yes, 2 for no, 2 for abstain
motions pass

Should /nenmen/ be added to the map as a separate nation with the borders in picrel?

/lazulight/: Y
/nasa/: A
/2434/: Y
/pcg/: Y
/vrt/: Y
/nijien/: Y
/haha/: Y
/inf/: A
/who/: A
/morig/: Y
/warkop/: Y
/wg/: Y
~~/sakuran/: Y~~
/nasfaqg/: Y
/meat/: A

11 10 for yes, 4 for abstain: motion passes

Should /pcg/ receive the land from /clg/ proposed in >>28802251 due to some of their chuubas moving from cyber to phase? You may propose your own suggestion as well.

/lazulight/: Y
/nasa/: Y
/2434/: Y
/pcg/: Y
/vrt/: N
/nijien/: Y
/haha/: Y
/inf/: Y
/who/: A
/morig/: A
/warkop/: Y
/wg/: A
~~/sakuran/: Y~~
/nasfaqg/: Y
/meat/: Y

11 10 for yes, 1 for no, 3 for abstain: motion passes

Several proposals have been made for updating nation names. Which of the following do you think should be changed?
/obsy/->/rose/
/mikeneko/->/rumina/
/clg/->/aeg/

/lazulight/: Y
/nasa/: Y
/2434/: Y
/pcg/: Y
/vrt/: Y
/nijien/: Y
/haha/: Y
/inf/: Y
/who/: Y
/morig/: Y
/warkop/: A
/wg/: Y
~~/sakuran/: Yes for /rumina/, abstain for others~~
/nasfaqg/: Y
/meat/: Y

/rumina/: 14 13 for yes, 1 for abstain
others: 13 for yes, 2 1 for abstain
motions pass

If a thread is replaced by an obvious successor in the catalog should the relevant nation be able to be renamed without being put up to a vote?

/lazulight/: Y
/nasa/: Y
/2434/: Y
/pcg/: Y
/vrt/: Y
/nijien/: Y
/haha/: Y
/inf/: case by case (counted as N)
/who/: case by case (counted as N)
/morig/: case by case (counted as N)
/warkop/: A
/wg/: Y
~~/sakuran/: N~~
/nasfaqg/: N
/meat/: Y

9 for yes, 5 4 for no, 1 for abstain: motion passes

To initiate a revote over an issue, currently one must have the support of at least three anons. Should this be changed to require the support of at least three reps/mediators?

/lazulight/: Only as last resort (counted as N)
/nasa/: Y
/2434/: Y
/pcg/: Y
/vrt/: 3 reps or 6 anons (counted as Y)
/nijien/: A
/haha/: Y
/inf/: Y
/who/: A
/morig/: N
/warkop/: A
/wg/: A
~~/sakuran/: N~~
/nasfaqg/: N
/meat/: N

6 for yes, 5 4 for no, 4 for abstain: no majority decision

Summary:

Point number 7 did not receive the requisite number of votes and will be revoted on next week with no abstain option. All other proposals have been approved by at least 50% of the participating representatives and are now in effect.