Botmakie Central Station
My older mail: thebotconnoisseur@proton.me - was burned and then re-estabilished by NOT ME.
My only real mail is: botconnoisseur@proton.me
Bot Reviews
Yvette
Card | Review |
---|---|
![]() |
When I looked at the image, I was instantly drawn to try it. It looks very good, and it fits the description inside the card very well—all you can expect from a good image. Additional pro is a set of alternative images the botmaker provided for download. Now, when looking at the definitions, at first glance, it looks like a very solid saviourfag card. Interesting premise, realistic personality, and a couple possible angles. But only when I started chatting did it hit me. Yvette is just great. I saved her, of course, and more than once. The card is great; it is very soulful, and it stirs feelings inside you. No matter what scenario or what different path I wanted to take, I had fun. She never broke immersion on any model and was engaging and keeping my interest the whole time. Overall, one of the best cards I had the pleasure to try. Highly recommended. |
Botmaker: teytey | Overall Score: 97/100 Connoisseur Mark: YES |
Cricket
Card | Review |
---|---|
![]() |
The first thing that grabs our attention is the image. It looks really good, and cutenotlewd clearly spent some time making it. A lot of work and effort, and the effect is worth it. The card image not only meets the standards but exceeds them. Next, we come to the definitions. At first sight, they might look a bit bloated, but we can quickly see that most of the tokens lie in the example messages. Looking at them, we can clearly see that both example messages and whole definitions were tailored for useless and retarded models, such as NAI's Kayra. That's not a good thing, in my book. If we move past that, the card itself is really good. The concept and the bot in work are really well done. I had a pleasure chatting with it. It might not be the most soulful and greatest of bots, but it certainly is unique and versatile; you can make many adventures with it and run many scenarios. Overall, the definitions could use a rewrite, but the end product is more than solid. I can't give it Connoisseur Mark, but it deserves a high score. |
Botmaker: cutenotlewd | Overall Score: 82/100 Connoisseur Mark: No |
Scarlett
Card | Review |
---|---|
![]() |
This bot was sent to me for review. First of all, the card image looks good. Really good. It is pleasant to look at and inviting. The only problem is that the image does not match the defs really well, and that might be misleading. The definitions gave me mixed feelings. On one hand, the concept, the execution, and how the card works with it is just amazing. The time flied quickly with her, and it was fun to try different scenarios - playing along, resisting, or even stress testing the bot. On the other hand, the formatting is far from good. A lot of tokens are lost in format, where plaintext would do just fine. That's the only issue I have with the definitions. Overall, the idea is a hot take; it is interesting and can suck you in, but the definitions should be rewritten. The end product doesn't suffer that badly on bigger models, but formatting it like that is a huge token loss for a concept that good. Despite not being a perfection, or the best card I interacted with, I can give it a Connoisseur Mark with a free conscience. Highly recommended. |
Botmaker: janewoods112 | Overall Score: 78/100 Connoisseur Mark: YES |
Lise
Card | Review |
---|---|
![]() |
Honestly, this card is a huge disappointment. But let me get to the details. At first, the image looks bad. It is not bad in terms of quality, but... it is clearly made to draw attention and increase numbers while not offering anything interesting or showing any character traits. It looks like generic big titted girl #16983. Next, dissecting the definitions. They are just... plain. Even after the rewrite, the card doesn't look good. Yes, the update did help a bit; I can't deny that. But it still didn't fix the main issue—the card sounds really generic and plain. The premise wants to be different, fresh, and interesting, but the execution is poor. When it comes to the chat, it doesn't shine. It doesn't draw attention enough to stay, and after trying a few different scenarios, it felt the same no matter what. Repetitive on all models. In the end, it's not the worst bot there is, but it's not recommended. |
Botmaker: DenseBanana | Overall Score: 31/100 Connoisseur Mark: NO |